Archive for the ‘Current Research’ Category

Incentive-ology: the science of motivation

Monday, November 24th, 2008

Written by Mike Allan

Motivation. It’s the fuel that gets us all moving toward our goals. It’s what wakes us up to face the day each morning and what lives in our dreams when we go to sleep at night. If we could bottle it, patent it and put it on a shelf, we’d all be millionaires.

But is motivation something that dwells only within an individual, or can we (as HR Professionals) guide it, shape it and bend it to our will? Can employee incentives really motivate lasting changes in behavior? To answer this question, we need to delve more deeply in to the science behind motivation.

According to the interim results from the Hbc 2007 HR INCENTIVE SURVEY (hbccards.com/survey), the number one ‘Point of Pain’ among HR Professionals who have responded to date is low motivation. Obviously, motivational issues are a major concern to HR professionals and ways of improving motivation among employees are highly sought after.

There are really two types of motivators intrinsic and extrinsic.

Extrinsic motivators are things that are external to one’s self. They are outside forces such as money, promotions, rewards, etc. Intrinsic motivators are forces internal to one’s self. Things like self esteem, satisfaction, pleasure, etc.

Intrinsic motivators are generally considered much more powerful because, like almost everything involving human beings, we give weight to what manifests from within ourselves more than manifests from outside. In short, they are more powerful, because they are more personal.

When we talk about incentives in the HR world, we are almost always talking about extrinsic motivators such as cash, prizes, points or the like. We have all been taught to believe that extrinsic rewards alone can motivate action.

In fact, there is good evidence to suggest that the opposite is often true. Adding an extrinsic reward (such as cash) to an action that was previously performed for intrinsic reasons (say, a passion for craftsmanship) can often reduce the desired behavior.

The reason could be as simple as this. By taking an activity that was previously engaged in for intrinsic reasons (more powerful) and adding an extrinsic incentive (less powerful) we have somehow ‘cheapened’ that activity in the mind of the individual being affected. As an example, think of anyone you know who works in a job they’re passionate about, versus someone who works purely for the money.

So does this mean the idea of providing employee incentives is ineffective? Not at all!

Extrinsic rewards are easily assignable to other individuals, but are not as powerful. Intrinsic rewards are extremely powerful motivators, but because they come from within, they’re inherently difficult to assign to other individuals.

So, we need to find a way to tie extrinsic incentives we can assign to our employees with the intrinsic benefits that motivate them on an individual basis. Viola!!! An Employee Incentives program this is both easily assignable and yet individually powerful at the same time!

Let’s look at an example using a typical employee. For argument’s sake, let’s call him Bob. It’s quite easy to provide a temporary boost in motivation by providing Bob an extrinsic reward such as a cash bonus, time off or a gift card he can redeem for whatever he’d like. However, we have yet to tap into Bob’s deeper, more powerful motivation hot buttons by attaching this extrinsic reward to something that will motivate Bob on a personal level.

And therein lies on of the biggest (and most overlooked) opportunities in the world of corporate incentives today, linking the extrinsic rewards we offer our employees and customer, to a more personal, more powerful intrinsic benefit that will provide stronger and longer lasting motivation for improvement.

Lets go back to the example of our now model employee, Bob. If Bob receives a $100 cash bonus each time he meets his monthly quota for sales, he quickly learns the cause and effect relationship and will strive to meet this minimum goal each month.

You’re probably saying to yourself, “that’s good, isn’t it?”. Well, yes and no. We are in fact, creating effective change in Bob’s behavior and achieving our collective goals. However, we’ve failed to affect change on a deeper, more personal level — we’ve failed to tie the extrinsic benefit of a cash bonus to a more personal, more powerful intrinsic benefit.

So what could we have done differently? Well, for starters, we could think very carefully about the ‘other’ reasons Bob might actually want to contribute to the goal. How about the ‘thrill of the kill,’ the rush that comes from making the deal? The desire to be recognized and praised in front of his peers? Any of these intrinsic motivators could be trigger-points for Bob that will provide more powerful and longer lasting motivation then cash alone.

The problem is, how do we tie these powerful, personal motivators (which we can’t control), to a less powerful but easily shaped extrinsic motivator such as a monetary reward (which we can control).

The answer lies in the concepts of sentiment and context.

Context is simply the situational relevance of the incentive received. In other words, what are the specifics of the situation that resulted in the reward being given and received. Was it for reaching a specific sales target? Referring a new employee? Closing a huge account? In order for Bob to be motivated by the incentive to perform similar acts in the future, he needs to be completely clear on the context in which the incentive was given.

The second and much more important component of the incentive is the sentiment. The sentiment is essentially the feelings, emotions and thoughts we are intending to evoke in the recipient, by giving the incentive. It is the sentiment that is missing from most of the corporate incentives work being done today. In short, it’s not enough to help Bob understand the reason the incentive was given, he must also deeply feel the intrinsic benefit of achieving the goal.

So, how do we do this? Simple – Personalization. By personalizing the incentive to the experience, we can tie the extrinsic benefit of the incentive itself, with the intrinsic benefits that will truly motivate and even inspire Bob over the long term.

To understand how this might work in Bob’s case, let’s look at a specific example, using a gift card as the incentive.

Let’s say our collective goal is for Bob to lead his sales team to their best year ever, surpassing all previous records. Let’s also say that we’ve broken this lofty goal down into a series of more bit-sized monthly goals and that we’re willing to provide a monthly incentive of a gift card loaded with a percentage of the increase in sales over last year’s figures for that month (a great extrinsic incentive).

There is no doubt that this extrinsic incentive alone might provide certain level of additional motivation for Bob to at least achieve the minimal level of sales required. However, there’s more we can do in this case. We can tap into Bob’s inherent desire to lead and succeed, by reminding him of why he’s reached the level he’s at and why he wants to take it to the next level as well, not just for the benefit of the organization, but for himself as well.

The sentiment we wish to invoke in this case might be the passion he feels for the ‘thrill of the kill’ that got him into this game in the first place – and the same passion that has brought him to this point in his career up until now. We can invoke these feelings and tie them to the desired actions by simply acknowledging the context for which the incentive was given, and weaving them together with the sentiment we’re hoping to invoke.

Say, for example, that we replace the generic gift card we were planning to give Bob for meeting his monthly targets, with a more personalized gift card and signed, personalized letter that both reiterate the context and sentiment we’re looking for.

Going back for a moment to the Hbc 2007 HR INCENTIVE SURVEY, the majority of respondents have stated they ‘strongly agree’ that offering more personalized incentives would Increase the employee’s goodwill/appreciation for the reward. They also ‘strongly agree’ that more personalization would increase the employee’s motivation to perform well in the future. Clearly, personalization is catching-on in the world of employee incentives, and HR professionals are beginning to respond accordingly.

There are virtually as many contexts and sentiments for providing incentives as our creative minds can conceive, including examples from these universal categories:

  1. apologies/win-backs

  2. congratulations

  3. holidays

  4. introductions

  5. milestones

  6. thank yous, and

  7. welcomes

Remember, the time the extrinsic benefit reaches fruition is at the time of redemption of the incentive (in this case, the gift card). In other words, the goodwill created by the incentive is fully realized when the recipient actually redeems the gift card, much more so then when it is received. It is important that the desired sentiment is reinforced at this point as well, if we hope to permanently make the connection between the context and the sentiment. This is the true power the personalized gift card can provide.

So remember, when searching for a way to motivate your employees that is both powerful and long lasting; don’t overlook the effect of personalization. By personalizing both the context and sentiment of the incentive, you’ll magnify the effect of your incentive and reap a far greater return in the long run.

Published in Workplace News. July/August 2007. Volume 13. Issue 4

Benchmark your incentive program

Monday, November 24th, 2008

The Hbc 2007 HR Incentives Survey results are in

Written by Keith Dunas
Are your employees engaged? Are your customers satisfied? Your company profitable?

The link between engaged, motivated employees and profitability is obvious to all HR professionals. So too is the role HR incentive programs play in employee engagement. But how does your organization measure up? How do your practices compare to those of your colleagues elsewhere? Is your incentive program ailing, or robust?

Find out now …The doctor is in. The final results from the Hbc 2007 HR Incentives Survey, sponsored by Hbc and Strategic Direct Marketing Group, should give you some insight into the health of your incentive program. This survey explored some conditions critical to the assessment of incentive programs; and we’re grateful to the survey participants who willingly responded with some self-diagnosis.

To complete your checkup, we invite you to take the survey, found at www.hbccards.com/survey, and compare your results to the tabulated findings.

We’d like to thank everyone who contributed to this survey, which we’ll use as a benchmark for future surveys as issues and remedies continue to evolve.

HR Issues today
All HR programs are delivered in the internal and external context of our times. Each day we contend with internal policies that we, as managers, implement, as well as external, macro-level influences beyond our control. And that’s where we started the survey, by asking respondents to tell us their points of pain — those issues they meet each day that affect their work plans and employees, and inform the HR policy.

The biggest concern for HR professionals is employee motivation. That concern takes on more meaning when we regard it in the context of downsizing and mergers and acquisitions issues. Not surprisingly, this result is also expressed in subsequent findings, where motivation concerns are being actively addressed by HR programs utilizing incentive programs, as below.

Incentive programs, as we know, provide an effective remedy to address employee motivation. Interestingly, we learned many organizations provide incentives within their health and wellness policies — an innovation that rewards employees with an increased appreciation for healthy lifestyle as well as the extrinsic reward of the incentive itself.

Interestingly, incentive programs that support and encourage employee competence or performance appear to be more popular than programs that are less directly related to day-to-day activities. Perhaps we prefer to recognize and reward positive behavior that we can directly control, manage, and improve.

Little wonder about the popularity of length of service rewards. Length of service rewards lie at the very heart of company loyalty, offer the occasion to celebrate long-standing contributions, and demonstrate another benefit of enduring company loyalty. This recognition also serves to subtly support an employee retention strategy, key to profitability in times where employee loyalty seems fleeting.

The balancing act — corporate HR agendas and personal motivation
HR professionals serve all manners of organizations, in all manners of industries, each of which promotes their own distinctive culture and personality. These business cultures have evolved to support each organization’s raison d’être, and staff both responds to and influences this workplace environment.

Like any other HR program, incentive programs ought to promote organizational culture while, at the same time, appealing to each participant at a very personal level. The good news is that these seemingly competing agendas are not such a tough balancing act, especially when you apply an appropriate incentive program reward structure.

Further, this sentiment — that personalization is fundamentally important — is a primary consideration when you review the variety of incentive programs available:

Above all else, personalization — across the organization — is critical to the success of the program. Obviously program participants are less concerned with administration issues than they are with redemption opportunities that appeal to them on a very personal level. Respondents believe that employees respond to programs where they can redeem their incentive quickly, conveniently, and economically. And this observation is consistent with what respondents told us in the survey itself.

The results of this survey confirms our experience — that respondents believe personalized incentive programs are of benefit to their organizations because these programs increase relevance to the participants, enhances their motivation to participate, and thus buoy the effectiveness of the incentive program overall.

At the same time, the survey results also starkly revealed a common misconception around the cost structure of personalized incentive programs — that, because these programs are personalized, they bring with them an increase in operational and management cost.

Perhaps it is these concerns around fulfillment and operational costs that reflect respondent’s current preference around incentive programs, with regard to preferred incentive types.


It appears that companies are gravitating toward gifts that allow the end user to make choices in the actual gift itself. Gift cards are leading the way to blend high touch with flexibility to pick your gift/reward.

So how do you strike this balance between personalization and strict management of operational, fulfillment, and redemption costs? These considerations are precisely the issues that fuelled the rapid development of the customized corporate gift card sector. Combining the effectiveness of using gift cards as incentives with customization options provides the ideal solution.

Perhaps that’s why many HR professionals are turning to gift card providers to address the costs of personalized incentive programs and ease of administration. Gift cards that provide multiple retail redemption alternatives provide flexibility to the employee — the more retail stores that accept the gift card, the greater the opportunity the employee will find a gift that’s meaningful — without taxing the already overburdened HR professional with additional administration or fulfillment responsibilities.

Management endorsement
Any program designed to incent or influence employee behavior needs to be endorsed by senior staff. This endorsement is typically supported through internal marketing communications — campaigns that define the goals, quantify the objectives, and engage the staff in a memorable way. Just as important, management needs to convey its endorsement of the incentive program operationally, through frequent, concise communications and dialog. The content of these messages should clearly define program goals, and how these goals will be measured, and achievement rewarded.


While many respondents are satisfied with their communications and organizational support for incentive programs, the predominance of the neutral response, neither agree nor disagree, shows that we can make improvements to support these programs, company wide.

Certainly, formal internal communications programs — newsletters, posters, web sites, and e-mails — are useful to convey incentive program goals and objectives, and staff achievement creatively. Just like any advertising media, you need to “cut through the clutter” to get the attention of your staff. That means messages need to be simple, goals measurable, and success well defined, or you risk losing your audience — and their motivation.

So, make it fun. Make it exciting. If your incentive program communications read like a corporate news release, you’ve already sent a message to your staff that the program itself is less than inspirational.

Run a teaser campaign. Set a launch date. Use the web and e-mail to entice, and print material to explain. Change it up from time to time. If you have an external agency, use its creative team to help you bring the incentive program to life. However, like we find in any successful advertising campaign, the message should be compelling and simple.

Subtle, informal methods are often just as productive as formal communication programs. Encourage managers to talk about the programs, from time to time, during weekly meetings, one-on-ones, or around the water cooler. Over time staff will embrace and endorse the program, as they continue to see their managers naturally promote these incentives and foster the corporate values these incentives encourage.

So how did you measure up? Do you share the sentiments of your colleagues; or do you hold a differing view?

Published in Workplace News, November/December 2007. Volume 13. Issue 4 (http://www.workplace-mag.com/Benchmark-your-incentive-program.html)